Johnny Depp vs Amber Heard: Legal expert say the result of the trial is ‘strange’ & ‘unexpected’


Authorized knowledgeable consider that the decision within the  bombshell defamation case of Johnny Depp and Amber Heard is ‘unusual and surprising.’ 

On Wednesday, Depp gained the libel lawsuit and was awarded $15 million in damages by the jury whereas the Aquaman star was awarded $2 million in damages in regard to her countersuit introduced towards her former husband.

Emily D. Baker, lawyer and authorized analyst instructed Individuals Journal, “It’s a unusual end result. Johnny Depp gained all three of his defamation claims, and Amber Heard gained considered one of her counterclaims.”

David Glass, household regulation legal professional and former psychologist, can be of the opinion that it was “a really surprising end result,” as he stated that it’s “comparatively uncommon” that each events to concurrently have wins and losses in a defamation path.

Glass added, “It signifies that the jury discovered that every of them had been telling the reality sufficient to get their verdict. But it surely’s clearly in favor of Johnny Depp as a result of the jury simply didn’t consider something that Amber Heard had stated — aside from her knowledgeable saying that her profession was barely broken.”

“What I feel spoke very loudly is that the jury awarded $10 million in compensatory damages to Johnny Depp (and) $5 million in punitive, (despite the fact that) that was lowered by the courtroom already as a result of Virginia doesn’t permit greater than $350,000 in punitive damages,” Barker shared with the publication.

She went on to say that, “The punitive damages are the punishment damages, saying we do not like what you probably did. And that 5 million quantity is, I feel, a message,” including that Heard was awarded $2 million in damages however “zero in punitive,” which “was the loudest message the jury despatched.”

Glass added that awarding punitive damages to Depp signifies that the jury was of the view that Heard “did this on function to try to damage him,” as Baker stated that this implies the jury “didn’t consider” Heard.

“I feel Johnny Depp’s authorized crew had the benefit of realizing how Amber Heard would current to a jury after seeing her testify within the U.Ok. And I feel that they relied on that — they relied on whether or not a jury’s going to consider her or not, they relied on her previous statements,” shared Barker.

Speaking about Depp’s authorized crew, Glass shared with the outlet that they did ” job together with his testimony in making ready him as a result of he got here off as a damage youngster. They usually talked about his personal childhood upbringing to carry round some sympathy for him. And that was an excellent transfer as a result of they allowed him to behave that manner.”

“I feel they did one of the best they might,” he stated about Heard’s crew. “She needed to inform her story. She instructed it in a really dramatic trend. Maybe she went too far in citing new tales that had by no means been introduced up earlier than, and maybe that is what turned the jury.”

“This case boiled down to 1 (risky) relationship that lasted a couple of yr and had allegations on each side. So it is a very uncommon, very distinctive case,” Glass additional added.

Glass concluded his assertion, saying that he doesn’t consider the case could have “a whole lot of affect elsewhere aside from possibly in regulation colleges educating about defamation. As a result of, truthfully if you go to regulation college, you are taught that these defamation instances virtually by no means win, and it is very laborious to show the damages — to hyperlink very brief, small statements to any type of actual financial injury to your repute or your employment.”

“And so this type of stands out as an outlier that I feel shall be talked about, however solely when it comes to it actually does not match the weather of defamation.”



Source link

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.