Depp attorney tries to discredit Heard as cross-examination concludes

Placeholder whereas article actions load

Cross-examination of Amber Heard by certainly one of Johnny Depp’s attorneys concluded Tuesday afternoon in Fairfax County within the bitter defamation trial between the movie celebrities. Depp legal professional Camille Vasquez’s rapid-fire questions sought to discredit Heard’s testimony and constantly categorized her as abusive towards her ex-husband throughout their tumultuous relationship and marriage.

Depp sued Heard for $50 million over a 2018 op-ed she revealed in The Washington Publish, which alleged home abuse from an unnamed individual. He claims the piece has ruined his popularity and his profession and contends that he by no means bodily or sexually abused Heard. She countersued him for $100 million after his attorneys stated her allegations have been false. (The Publish will not be a defendant within the lawsuit.)

Vasquez introduced the jury with a knife Heard gave Depp for his birthday engraved with the phrase “until dying” in Spanish. “That is the knife you gave to the person who would get drunk and violent with you,” Vasquez stated.

“I wasn’t frightened he was going to stab me with it,” Heard stated.

As she would all through her cross-examination questions Tuesday, Vasquez then rapidly pivoted, mentioning one other, unrelated incident. She questioned Heard’s testimony regarding a very brutal incident she alleged happened in Australia, through which she claims she was sexually assaulted with a liquor bottle and the tip of Depp’s finger was severed. Depp alleges Heard minimize his finger by throwing a vodka bottle at him, whereas the protection suggests Depp injured himself.

Vasquez targeted on the sequence of occasions, which she prompt have been unbelievable — claiming Depp couldn’t accomplish that a lot injury with a severed finger. Heard maintained that she didn’t recall the order through which issues occurred, saying, “I’ve by no means claimed that I can keep in mind the precise sequence of these items. It is a multiday assault that happened over three horrible days.”

Vasquez additional sought to discredit Heard’s testimony in regards to the incident in Australia by stating “there’s not a single medical document” of Heard’s accidents, nor are there any images of them.

Vasquez famous that Heard expressed concern for Depp’s substance abuse however continued utilizing medication and alcohol herself. She questioned whether or not it was Heard who was jealous, somewhat than Depp — because the defendant has claimed. She prompt Depp acquired Heard her position within the film “Aquaman,” and introduced a tape recording through which Heard insulted Depp’s profession, calling him “washed-up” and a “joke.” She additionally introduced a number of units of textual content messages through which Heard repeatedly asks Depp to reply the cellphone, as an try and painting Heard as jealous. “You have been texting him incessantly,” Vasquez stated. Heard stated she despatched them in a determined try and get Depp to cease utilizing medication.

Vasquez pressed closely in opposition to Heard’s argument that the op-ed she wrote — which lies on the coronary heart of the trial — isn’t about Depp however about what occurred to her after she obtained a brief restraining order in opposition to the actor. “I used to be speaking a couple of greater problem, really, than simply Johnny,” Heard stated.

Heard’s countersuit revolves round a number of claims made within the press by Depp’s former lawyer Adam Waldman, who known as Heard’s accusations a hoax. She claims the accusations, which she characterised as a “damaging smear marketing campaign,” led to the lack of profession alternatives.

In response, Vasquez learn headlines from articles negatively characterizing Heard that have been revealed earlier than Waldman’s feedback.

The cross-examination lasted till about 2:40 p.m., at which level Heard’s legal professional, Elaine Bredehoft, started redirect questioning, through which she challenged a number of of Vasquez’s factors — equivalent to how Heard acquired her position in “Aquaman.”

“I labored actually arduous,” Heard stated.

The redirect lasted about 35 minutes, and Vasquez persistently — and efficiently — objected to questions from Bredehoft — usually so many instances in a row that it drew laughter from the courtroom viewers, which all through the trial has been composed of largely Depp followers.

The courtroom then performed the video deposition of artist iO Tillett Wright, a buddy of Heard’s who grew near Depp for a number of years. He described the actor as “beautiful,” “magical” and “very humorous” when he was sober, however “paranoid,” “imply” and “surly” when inebriated.

Although he by no means witnessed Depp bodily assault Heard, Wright stated, he heard Depp say issues round her, equivalent to “all she’s acquired is her seems.” He stated when Depp was inebriated, he would additionally “insult his followers” and name them “remoras,” also referred to as suckerfish. He additionally recalled Depp telling him that “he simply actually didn’t like life sober” and that he would “expertise nice bouts of jealousy in relationships.”

Simply after Depp and Heard’s bridal ceremony, Wright stated, he congratulated Depp on their nuptials. Depp allegedly responded, “We’re married. Now I can punch her within the face and no person can do something about it.”

He additionally relayed an incident through which he was on the cellphone with Heard, who informed him that Depp was satisfied they defecated on his pillow. Wright and Heard started laughing, he stated, and Depp grew agitated. Wright heard a smack, “and the cellphone dropped. And he stated to her, ‘You suppose I hit you? You suppose I f—ing hit you? What if I peel your f—ing hair again?’ After which I heard the cellphone drop once more, and I heard her scream.”

The trial is scheduled to proceed Wednesday with testimony from extra witnesses.

Source link

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.